Like so many (millions of?) other people, I enjoyed Dan Brown's first book, The Da Vinci Code. I did read another of his, probably his second, but was disappointed. It was the last couple of chapters that did it, when the whole thing became just a tad too much like a James Bond story. I had read no more of Brown's work until I picked up The Lost Symbol, thinking to give him another chance. I shouldn't have bothered.
The main character is the world's leading symbologist, Harvard professor Robert Langdon, who appeared in The Da Vinci Code. Langdon is summoned to Washington by a close friend, who happens to be one of the world's richest men as well as a leading Freemason. The story then becomes submerged in almost forgotten and equally unknown tunnels beneath the Capitol building with excursions to a highly secret laboratory. Unfortunately, Langdon is one of the few characters in whom I found myself able to believe, most of the others being too rich, too intelligent or too evil. For my taste the plot is too surreal, almost fantasy.
I reached page 173 before giving up - and it took me a week to get that far - so I think I gave the book a fair crack. Sorry, Dan, but it's not for me and, as I didn't reach the end, I can only rate it as one star - despite it being number one in the charts.
5 comments:
So it's one of those where the reader hopes the hero gets bumped off at the end so that there's no sequel to suffer through.
I read Angels and Demons first, then the The Da Vinci Code. My thought is that they followed the same formula and resolved nothing.
I have to start watching what HTML tags I use.
The links do seem to be lost symbols :)
The links to nowhere. I had intended to italicize but had a brain fart [can I say that here?]
Be my guest - it doesn't bother me.
Post a Comment