Like so many (millions of?) other people, I enjoyed Dan Brown's first book, The Da Vinci Code. I did read another of his, probably his second, but was disappointed. It was the last couple of chapters that did it, when the whole thing became just a tad too much like a James Bond story. I had read no more of Brown's work until I picked up The Lost Symbol, thinking to give him another chance. I shouldn't have bothered.
The main character is the world's leading symbologist, Harvard professor Robert Langdon, who appeared in The Da Vinci Code. Langdon is summoned to Washington by a close friend, who happens to be one of the world's richest men as well as a leading Freemason. The story then becomes submerged in almost forgotten and equally unknown tunnels beneath the Capitol building with excursions to a highly secret laboratory. Unfortunately, Langdon is one of the few characters in whom I found myself able to believe, most of the others being too rich, too intelligent or too evil. For my taste the plot is too surreal, almost fantasy.
I reached page 173 before giving up - and it took me a week to get that far - so I think I gave the book a fair crack. Sorry, Dan, but it's not for me and, as I didn't reach the end, I can only rate it as one star - despite it being number one in the charts.
So it's one of those where the reader hopes the hero gets bumped off at the end so that there's no sequel to suffer through.
ReplyDeleteI read Angels and Demons first, then the The Da Vinci Code. My thought is that they followed the same formula and resolved nothing.
I have to start watching what HTML tags I use.
ReplyDeleteThe links do seem to be lost symbols :)
ReplyDeleteThe links to nowhere. I had intended to italicize but had a brain fart [can I say that here?]
ReplyDeleteBe my guest - it doesn't bother me.
ReplyDelete